Lite Technology Solutions logoTeri Green

T.E.S.T. Framework™ — Board-Ready Blueprint

AI Risk & Governance Dashboard
Board View

The exact Power BI dashboard blueprint your team can build fast, aligned to how you already present to leadership. Every slide, every KPI, every visual mapped out.

AI Risk & Exposure Snapshot

AI Risk & Exposure Snapshot

This is what your board will look at FIRST. Big tiles. Instant clarity. No jargon.

Total AI Tools in Use

24

Across all departments

Green (Approved)

54%

13 tools approved

Yellow (Controlled)

29%

7 tools with restrictions

Red (High Risk)

17%

4 tools blocked or under review

🟢 Approved🟡 Controlled🔴 High Risk

Risk Distribution

“Here's our current AI risk posture.”

A donut or bar chart that gives instant visual impact. Leadership sees the ratio of safe vs. risky tools at a glance.

24

AI Tools

Green (Approved)

54%

13 tools

Yellow (Controlled)

29%

7 tools

Red (High Risk)

17%

4 tools

High-Risk AI Tools 🔥

High-Risk AI Tools

This is where leadership leans in. A table showing every tool flagged RED, with department, risk score, the specific T.E.S.T. pillar driving the risk, and current status.

Tool NameDepartmentRisk ScoreRisk LevelKey Risk (T.E.S.T.)Status
Custom LLM AgentOperations17
RED
Execute / Store
Under Review
Student AI TutorK-12 / EdTech16
RED
Store / Trust
Blocked
Shadow GPT InstanceFinance18
RED
Touch / Store / Trust
Under Review
AI Resume ScreenerHR15
RED
Execute / Trust
Blocked

Board insight: These tools represent your highest exposure. Each one requires executive-level decision — approve with controls, or block until remediated.

T.E.S.T. Breakdown

Where risk is coming from.

A stacked bar chart showing Touch, Execute, Store, and Trust scores across all tools. This reveals your organization's weakest pillar at a glance.

Example insight

“Most of our risk is coming from data storage and lack of transparency.”

Average pillar scores across all AI tools

Touch3 / 5
Execute3.1 / 5
Store4.1 / 5
Trust2.5 / 5

⚠ Highest risk pillar: Store (4.1 avg)

Data storage practices are the biggest source of risk across your AI portfolio. Prioritize data flow audits and retention policy reviews.

Department-Level AI Usage

Who is using AI the most — and where risk is concentrated.

This is HUGE for executive conversations. Shows AI adoption by department with risk breakdown, so leadership knows exactly where to focus governance efforts.

IT

7 AI tools

4 2 1

HR

4 AI tools

1 1 2

Finance

3 AI tools

1 1 1

Schools / Programs

5 AI tools

3 1 1

Marketing

3 AI tools

2 1 0

Operations

2 AI tools

0 1 1

Trend Over Time

The maturity story.

A line graph showing % Green vs. % Red over time. This tells the board one thing:

“We are getting more controlled and intentional with AI.”

% Green vs. % Red — 12-month trend

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
% Green (trending up) % Red (trending down)

Governance Status Panel

Confidence or urgency.

A simple visual checklist that tells the board: “Here's what we have in place, and here's what still needs attention.” Green checks build confidence. Yellow warnings create urgency.

AI Governance Readiness

AI Acceptable Use Policy

In place

AI Review Process

In place

Tools Assessed via T.E.S.T.

In place

Board Reporting Cadence

In place

Shadow AI Detection

Needs attention

Incident Response Plan (AI)

Needs attention

CRITICAL 🔥

Executive Narrative Box

This is what gets copied into board minutes. A text box that summarizes the entire dashboard in four sentences.

Executive Summary

AI adoption is increasing across the organization. 24 tools are currently in use across 6 departments.

17% of tools are currently high risk due to uncontrolled data storage practices and insufficient vendor transparency.

Immediate focus is required on Store and Trust pillars, where average scores indicate the highest organizational exposure.

The T.E.S.T. Framework™ is being used to standardize evaluation and reduce exposure across all departments.

Pro tip: This narrative box should be updated quarterly and included in every board presentation. It's the single paragraph that drives executive action.

Your Data Structure

What feeds Power BI.

You only need a simple table. 11 columns. That's it. This can live in Excel, Google Sheets, or a SharePoint list.

Risk logic (automated in Power BI)

Total Score = T + E + S + T

4–8 → GREEN

9–14 → YELLOW

15–20 → RED

Where this data can live:

ExcelGoogle SheetsSharePoint List

Required columns

1

Tool Name

e.g. Microsoft Copilot
2

Department

e.g. Enterprise
3

Use Case

e.g. Document generation
4

Touch Score (1–5)

e.g. 3
5

Execute Score (1–5)

e.g. 4
6

Store Score (1–5)

e.g. 5
7

Trust Score (1–5)

e.g. 2
8

Total Score

e.g. 14 (auto)
9

Risk Level

e.g. Yellow
10

Status

e.g. Active
11

Date Reviewed

e.g. 2026-04-01

T.E.S.T edge 🔥

What makes THIS different.

Most dashboards show

Incidents

What already happened. Reactive. After the damage.

Compliance checklists

Binary yes/no. No context. No risk scoring.

Vendor reports

Generic. One-size-fits-all. Not your risk profile.

T.E.S.T dashboard shows

Decision quality

Before incidents happen. Proactive. Preventive.

Risk-scored AI tools

Every tool scored on 4 pillars. Context-rich. Defensible.

Your risk profile

Tailored to your organization. Your departments. Your tools.

“This isn't just what we've secured.
This is what we've chosen to trust.

Pause. Then:

“And anything in red… we shouldn't be trusting yet.”

🚀 Want this built for you?

Get the full dashboard package.

Request a custom build of the T.E.S.T. AI Risk & Governance Dashboard, tailored to your organization, your brand, and your board.

What you get

Power BI layout (exact visuals)
Sample dataset (Excel / Google Sheets)
DAX formulas for risk scoring
Executive-ready theme (your brand colors)
Exportable board slide version